Skip to content

2003

Caldwell et al., Physical Review Letters, 91, 071301, 2003

The Big Rip (2003): Phantom Energy and a Cosmic Doomsday

Showed in 2003 that dark energy with w below -1 would tear apart galaxies, planets and atoms in a finite time. Caldwell et al. on the Big Rip.

By The Orbital Record editorial team

The Big Rip is a possible end of the universe described by Robert Caldwell, Marc Kamionkowski and Nevin Weinberg in 2003. If dark energy is “phantom energy”, growing denser as space expands, it would eventually tear apart galaxy clusters, galaxies, solar systems, planets and finally atoms, all in a finite time.

The question before the paper

After the 1998 discovery of cosmic acceleration, cosmologists described dark energy by its equation of state, w, the ratio of its pressure to its energy density. A cosmological constant has w = -1 exactly: its density stays the same as space expands. Data at the time, such as the WMAP first-year limit of w < -0.78, did not rule out values below -1. The authors asked: what would it actually do to the universe?

What the paper found

  • Phantom energy grows. With w below -1, the density of dark energy increases as the universe expands, instead of staying constant or thinning out.
  • A finite end. The density becomes infinite in a finite time, ending the universe in a “Big Rip”.
  • A worked example. For w = -3/2 and a Hubble constant of 70 km/s per megaparsec, the Big Rip would come 22 billion years from now.
  • A countdown. In that example galaxy clusters are erased about 1 billion years before the end, the Milky Way is torn apart about 60 million years before, the Solar System becomes unbound a few months before, Earth explodes about 30 minutes before, and atoms are torn apart about 10-19 seconds before the end, followed by atomic nuclei.

How they did it

The paper applies the Friedmann equations of cosmology, which link the expansion rate to what the universe contains, to a universe dominated by phantom energy. As the dark energy density grows, the expansion accelerates without limit. Every bound object, held together by gravity or electromagnetic and nuclear forces, comes apart once the repulsion from dark energy inside it overcomes the forces binding it. Larger, more loosely bound structures go first.

Why it mattered

The Big Rip showed that the fate of the universe depends on the exact nature of dark energy, not just on whether it exists. A difference between w = -1 and w = -1.5, hard to tell apart in the data of the time, separates an eternal, slowly emptying universe from one that ends in 22 billion years. The paper made measuring w a question about the end of everything.

What we know now

Current data from Planck, DESI and supernova surveys are consistent with w close to -1. The Dark Energy Survey supernovae, combined with other data, give w = -0.941 ± 0.026. DESI’s 2025 results, from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, lean toward dark energy that is weakening, w above -1 today, which would avoid a Big Rip. None of this is settled as of October 2026. Compare the scenarios in Big Rip vs Big Crunch vs Big Freeze and the future of the universe guide.

Who wrote it

Robert Caldwell, Marc Kamionkowski and Nevin Weinberg wrote the paper together. It has about 1,100 citations in Semantic Scholar as of October 2026.

Read the original

Caldwell, R. R., Kamionkowski, M., and Weinberg, N. N. (2003). “Phantom Energy: Dark Energy with w < -1 Causes a Cosmic Doomsday.” Physical Review Letters 91, 071301. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.071301. Free on arXiv: astro-ph/0302506.

This week in papers

Five new results in one line each, plus one landmark like this one. Weekly.

2007

Krauss and Scherrer, General Relativity and Gravitation, 39, 1545-1550, 2007

The End of Cosmology: When the Big Bang's Evidence Fades

Argued in 2007 that accelerating expansion will erase the evidence of the Big Bang, leaving a static-looking universe. Krauss and Scherrer's essay.

Future of the universe
2008

Schröder and Smith, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 386, 155-163, 2008

Will the Sun Swallow Earth? Schröder and Smith Say Yes

Calculated in 2008 that the red giant Sun will engulf Earth about 7.6 billion years from now, despite losing a third of its mass. Schröder and Smith.

Future of the universe
1997 Landmark

Adams and Laughlin, Reviews of Modern Physics, 69, 337-372, 1997

A Dying Universe: The Five Ages of the Universe Explained

Mapped the universe's future into eras, from the age of stars to a dark era beyond 10100 years. Fred Adams and Gregory Laughlin's 1997 review, explained.

Future of the universe

Topic guide

Future of the universe

Recent news in future of the universe